We don't have to have car insurance. Or, is mandatory medical liability insurance next? - liability insurance comparison
Unlike the Liberals are in charge of defending Obama's recent statements about the amazing health care, we are not obligated to buy car insurance in order to achieve our own vehicles and damage to property, or recorded our own wounds.
We have to buy liability insurance, were to damage caused to vehicles and property of other persons and to cover the damage caused to third parties.
So that, we are required to purchase medical malpractice insurance in case we have an infectious disease, and give it to others, then we pay for care if they criticize us about his illness?
When Ted Kennedy was there, I would say yes.
But now, killed, Kennedy, Obama has lost his trip.
Do we seriously believe that the medical malpractice insurance is in every part of our political horizon required? I think not.
So, why no one seems to be driving a valid comparison between what is necessary, others by our actions to protect our cars,be necessary to protect our own costs for medical care?
Or are mere facts and logic, nothing to do with liberal rhetoric? I thought so.
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Liability Insurance Comparison We Don't Have To Have Car Insurance. Or, Is Mandatory Medical Liability Insurance Next?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
I paid for my-ins themselves. year. Why in the Xell I pay for the others. Obamaxx said he wanted ins to be competitive. Now he wants to tax. Where's the competition? #>@#>@#>@@@>###
He said that our Constitution is flawed. Do not take an oath to protect and respect our Constitution? The majority of the laws is very, very angry. You are trying to force us into a dictatorship.
They violated our constitutional rights, and things are not good. You try to forget, as Americans come together when they threatened.
Revolution is coming! American people is not the position of his socialism.
Auto insurance is required as part of owning a vehicle ... If you do not own a car, because you do not maintenance, gas, insurance, otherwise you must pay for car insurance.
With health insurance, there is absolutely no other choice, we have all the facilities
Therefore, no ... No comparison
I disagree with the government forces me to do something, and I am very happy with the way they provide healthcare for my family for 20 years ... I do not know how the decisions of the health care of my family was not a government
To determine whether this right
You drive your car and crisis in a highway underpass at high speed
Even if you are having a liability insurance for your car, you do not have private insurance coverage for themselves
Who pays for multiple injuries?
[Cue Jeopardy music]
The American taxpayer is not .. have not, but we
In fact, you are completely wrong. Many states require insurance coverage for PIP (no fault).
The following states require PIP coverage: Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Utah and Texas.
It is possible and works quite well.
In fact, that you have a good time for the benefit of the statutory health insurance, why else was in place when someone will be paying on car insurance to medical care caused by a car accident?
In fact, that you have a good time for the benefit of the statutory health insurance, why else was in place when someone will be paying on car insurance to medical care caused by a car accident?
If you do not drive a car or a single vehicle on private property no insurance either.
Post a Comment